Spatial-temporal pattern and influencing factors of corporate innovation in three coastal urban clusters in China

LIU Shufeng1,2 DU Debin1,2 QIN Xionghe1,2 HE Shunhui1,2

(1.Institute for Global Innovation & Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China 200062)
(2.School of Urban & Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China 200062)
【Knowledge Link】friction coefficient

【Abstract】As the core areas of the regional economy, urban clusters plays the important roles in leading the national innovation and development. This paper uses Gini coefficient, concentration index, kernel density, spatial correlation index, and spatial econometric model to analyze the enterprises in terms of their technological innovation, spatial difference, spread pattern, hierarchical structure and influencing factors among the urban clusters in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta based on the data of 1,408,713 patents of enterprises from 1995 to 2013. We found that (1) Chinese corporate innovation presents an overall exponential growth with different characteristics in different phases, and the changing trends are different among the three urban clusters. Entry into the WTO and the economic crisis in 2008 are the two important events that have an impact on corporate innovation. (2) The change of spatial variation index of corporate innovation in the three major urban clusters shows an inverted U-shape. The spatial difference of urban clusters in in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is the most significant with the driving of Beijing and Tianjin. In addition, there is no hierarchical structure of urban innovation yet. There is a “polycentric band-shaped spread” trend of urban clusters in the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta, and there are two hierarchical structures in the two major urban clusters, namely, “pyramid” and “inverted-pyramid.” (3) By analyzing the influencing factors, it can be found that economic foundation and support from the government policies are important guarantee for corporate innovation. The effects of the factors such as the industrial structure, the local higher education resources and the FDI are significantly differentiated in different regions.

【Keywords】 urban cluster; corporate innovation; spatial-temporal pattern; polycentric; hierarchical structure; spatial panel metrics;

【DOI】

【Funds】 National Natural Science Foundation of China (41471108)

Download this article

    Footnote

    [1]. (1) Urban clusters in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region cover Beijing, Tianjin, Shijiazhuang, Tangshan, Qinhuangdao, Xingtai, Baoding, Zhangjiakou, Chengde, Cangzhou, Langfang, and Hengshui. Urban clusters in the Yangtze River Delta cover Shanghai, Nanjing, Wuxi, Changzhou, Suzhou, Nantong, Yancheng, Yangzhou, Zhenjiang, Taizhou, Hanghzou, Ningbo, Jiaxing, Huzhou, Shaoxing, Jinhuan, Zhoushan, Taizhou, Hefei, Wuhu, Maanshan, Tongling, Anqing, Chuzhou, Chizhou, and Xuancheng. Urban clusters in the Pearl River Delta cover Guangzhou, Shenzheng, Zhuhai, Foshan, Dongguan, Zhongshan, Jiangmen, Zhaoqing, Huizhou, Shanwei, Qingyuan, Yunfu, Heyuan, and Shaoguan.

    References

    [1] Niu, F., Liu, W., Song, T. et al. Geographical Research (地理研究), 34 (08): 1447–1460 (2015).

    [2] Ning, Y. Scientia Geographica Sinica (地理科学), 31 (03): 257–263 (2011).

    [3] Du, D. 全球科技创新中心: 动力与模式. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, (2015).

    [4] Feng, Z., Liu, Y., Fang, X. et al. Science Research Management (科研管理), 36 (11): 1–10 (2015).

    [5] OECD. Supporting investment in knowledge capital, growth and innovation. Paris: OECD, 2013.

    [6] He, C. & Mao, X. Progress in Geography (地理科学进展), 34 (9): 1073–1083 (2015).

    7] Bjørn T. Asheim, Meric S. Gertler. The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems. Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 2005 (3): 210–229.

    [8] Do innovation measures actually measure innovation? Obliteration, symbolic adoption, and other finicky challenges in tracking innovation diffusion. Research Policy, 2014, 43 (6): 927–940.

    [9] Balland P. A, Rigby D. The geography of complex knowledge. Economic Geography, 2017, 93 (1): 1–23.

    [10] Etzkowitz H, Zhou C. The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Routledge, 2017.

    [11] Duan, D., Du, D. & Liu, C. Acta Geographica Sinica (地理学报), 70 (12): 1911–1925 (2015).

    [12] Capello R, Lenzi C. Spatial heterogeneity in knowledge, innovation, and economic growth nexus: conceptual reflections and empirical evidence. Journal of Regional Science, 2014, 54 (2): 186–214.

    [13] Han, Z. Yuan, Y. & Peng, F. Economic Geography (经济地理), 38 (01): 103–111 (2018).

    [14] Carlino G A, Chatterjee S, Hunt R M. Urban density and the rate of invention. Journal of Urban Economics, 61 (3): 389–419 (2007).

    [15] Li, J. & Tu, Q. Urban Development Studies (城市发展研究), 2015, 22(10): 85–91.

    [16] Lee B, Gordon P. Urban Spatial Structure and Economic Growth in U.S. Metropolitan Areas. The 46th Annual Meetings of the Western Regional Science Association, at Newport Beach, CA, 2007.

    [17] Meijers E. Summing small cities does not make a large city: polycentric urban regions and the provision of cultural, leisure and sports amenities. Urban Studies, 2008, 45 (11): 2323–2342.

    [18] Sun, B., Hua, J., Li, W. et al. Progress in Geography (地理科学进展), 36 (10): 1294–1303 (2017).

    [19] Fang, C., Ma, H., Wang, Z. et al. Acta Geographica Sinica (地理学报), 69 (4): 459–473 (2014).

    [20] Lyu, L., Xie, Y. & Huang, R. Human Geography (人文地理), 28 (03): 91–95 (2013).

    [21] Zeng, G., Wang, Q. & Cao, X. Economic Geography (经济地理), 38 (04): 19–25 (2018).

    [22] Balland P A, Boschma R, Frenken K. Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 2015, 49 (6): 907–920.

    [23] Sun, T. Economic Geography (经济地理), 36 (05): 63–70 (2016).

    [24] Capello R, Lenzi C. Spatial heterogeneity in knowledge, innovation, and economic growth nexus: conceptual reflections and empirical evidence. Journal of Regional Science, 2014, 54 (2): 186–214.

    [25] Anselin L. Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.

    [26] Li X. Behind the recent surge of Chinese patenting: An institutional view. Research Policy, 2012, 41(1): 236–249.

    [27] Qi, Y., Yang, Y. & Jin, F. Acta Geographica Sinica (地理学报), 68 (4): 517–531 (2013).

    [28] Sun, D., Lu, D., Zhang, J. et al. Scientia Geographica Sinica (地理科学), 37 (7): 967–975 (2017).

    [29] Kaldor N. Economic Growth and the Verdoorn Law: A Comment on Mr Rowthorn’s Article. The Economic Journal,1975, 85 (340): 891–896.

    [30] Wu, F. & Liu, R. China Industrial Economics (中国工业经济), (05): 57–69 (2013).

    [31] Guo, Y., Gu, W., Wu, T. et al. China Soft Science (中国软科学), (3): 162–174 (2016).

    [32] Cowan R, Zinovyeva N. University effects on regional innovation. Research Policy, 2013, 42 (3): 788–800.

    [33] Piperopoulos P, Wu J, Wang C. Outward FDI, location choices and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises. Research Policy, 2018, 47 (1): 232–240.

This Article

ISSN:1000-8462

CN:43-1126/K

Vol 38, No. 12, Pages 111-118

December 2018

Downloads:6

Share
Article Outline

Knowledge

Abstract

  • 1 Data and research methods
  • 2 The spatial-temporal evolution of the innovation of enterprises in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta
  • 3 Analysis of factors influencing the innovation output by spatial metric analysis
  • 4 Conclusion and discussion
  • Footnote

    References