Optimal Selection Method of Magnetic Ranging Tools for Relief Well Engineering Based on the Measurement Error of the Adjacent Well Distance

YU Ruifeng1 DIAO Binbin1 GAO Deli1

(1.MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249)
【Novelty】For the measurement error evaluation of active magnetic ranging tools, a measurement error calculation model of active magnetic ranging tools is built. Compared with the traditional trapezoidal model, this model uses the error ellipse to quantitatively calculate the magnetic ranging error of measuring points, and it can be coupled with the measurement error calculation model for wellbore trajectories to calculate the measurement error of the distance between the predicted ranging point of an accident well and the bottom hole of a relief well. By comparing the spatial relationship between the detection range of active magnetic ranging tools and the synthetic error ellipse, the optimization method of active magnetic ranging tools is presented. This method can select magnetic ranging tools with high measurement accuracy and fewer operation risks on the premise of ensuring that the accident well can be detected.

【Abstract】Measurement errors of the relative distance from an accident well to its relief well were calculated by magnetic ranging tools with higher measurement accuracy and lower operational risks on the premise that the accident well was within the tools’ detection ranges. As the error calculated by the “trapezoidal” error model could not be coupled with the wellbore trajectory error, a measurement error model for magnetic ranging tools was built through the covariance propagation rate. The measurement errors of magnetic ranging tools were coupled with the wellbore trajectory errors to obtain the total covariance matrixes in the working planes of the magnetic ranging tools. The error ellipses and the optimal selection method for magnetic ranging tools for the relief well were thereby derived. The example calculation showed that when the current bottom of the relief well was 7.41 m away from the accident well, the semi-axis lengths of the measurement error ellipse were 1.26 m and 0.33 m. After the ranging operation, the relief well drilling continued. The Wellspot tool and RGR-I tool were recommended when the relative distance between the two wells was 6.68 m and then shortened to 5.21 m and further to 2.07 m, respectively. The research results show that the decreasing trend of the relative distance between the two wells is greater than the increasing trend of the measurement error of the relative distance after the ranging operations and as relief well drilling continues. When the detection ranges of the magnetic ranging tools fully cover the measurement error ellipse of the relative distance between the two wells, the magnetic ranging tool with a smaller measurement range but higher accuracy can be used.

【Keywords】 relief well; relative distance; measurement error; magnetic ranging tools; tool selection;

【DOI】

【Funds】 Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1762214) Group Project of Innovation Research of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51821092)

Download this article

    References

    [1] LIU Shujie, LI Xiangfang, HE Yingming, et al. Key drilling technology for marine deepwater relief wells [J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2015, 37 (3): 15–18 (in Chinese).

    [2] JIANG Haitao. Study on the technology of intercommunicating the relief well and the accident well [D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2014 (in Chinese).

    [3] LI Cui, GAO Deli, LIU Qinglong, et al. A method of calculating of avoiding collisions with adjacent wells using electromagnetic ranging surveying while drilling tools [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44 (5): 52–59 (in Chinese).

    [4] LI Cui, GAO Liping, LI Jia, et al. Experiment research on an electromagnetic anti-collision detection tool while drilling adjacent wells [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2017, 45 (6): 110–115 (in Chinese).

    [5] ZHANG Sen, DIAO Binbin, GAO Deli. Numerical simulation and sensitivity analysis of accurate ranging of adjacent wells while drilling [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 195: 107536.

    [6] LI Cui, GAO Deli, DIAO Binbin, et al. A detection system based on three-electrode array for connecting a relief well to failure well [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34 (6): 1181–1188 (in Chinese).

    [7] XU Linkang. Research on the method of relative attitude recognition in near distance of relief well by TEM [D]. Xi’an: Xi’an Shiyou University, 2020 (in Chinese).

    [8] FU Youyi, ZHOU Honglin, CHEN Jiajie. Design and application of Changxin 5 milled casing relief well in Dagang Oilfield [J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 43 (5): 5–8 (in Chinese).

    [9] HAO Xining, WANG Yu, DANG Bo, et al. Research on electromagnetic detection and positioning methods and tools for relief wells [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49 (3): 75–80 (in Chinese).

    [10] ZHANG Diping. Research on location method of underground electromagnetic positioning [D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2018 (in Chinese).

    [11] LI Fengfei, JIANG Shiquan, ZHOU Jianliang, et al. Discussion on the design of well trajectories in deepwater relief wells [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2017, 45 (1): 21–26 (in Chinese).

    [12] LI Fengfei, JIANG Shiquan, LI Hanxing, et al. Analysis of electromagnetic probe for relief well [J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2014, 42 (1): 56–61 (in Chinese).

    [13] GONG Dahong, CHEN Yuanpeng, YANG Wenjuan, et al. 3-D visual study of well trajectory uncertainty and application [J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2019, 42 (6): 9–12 (in Chinese).

    [14] WILLIAMSON H S. Accuracy prediction for directional measurement while drilling [J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2000, 15 (4): 221–233.

    [15] FAN Guangdi, PU Wenxue, ZHAO Guoshan, et al. Correction methods for axial magnetic interference of the magnetic inclinometer while drilling [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2017, 45 (4): 121–126 (in Chinese).

    [16] XU Haodong, HUANG Genlu, ZHANG Ran, et al. Method of magnetic interference correction in survey with magnetic MWD [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2014, 42 (2): 102–106 (in Chinese).

    [17] LI Fengfei, JIANG Shiquan, ZHOU Jianliang, et al. Research on the design of ranging plan for relief wells [J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2017, 29 (4): 118–122 (in Chinese).

    [18] GAO Deli, DIAO Binbin. Development of the magnetic guidance drilling technique in complex well engineering [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44 (5): 1–9 (in Chinese).

    [19] ISCWSA. Introduction to wellbore positioning [R]. [S. l.]: The Research Office of UHI, 2017.

    [20] XI Baobin, GAO Deli. Analysis of the relative position uncertainty in the intersecting process of U-shaped horizontal wells [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2014, 42 (6): 18–24 (in Chinese).

    [21] LI Cui, GAO Deli. Preliminary research on detection method for connecting relief well to blowout well [J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2013, 41 (3): 56–61 (in Chinese).

    [22] LI Cui. Research on detection method for making relief well connected to blowout well [D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2014 (in Chinese).

    [23] HU Shengwu, XIAO Benlin. Error theory and measurement adjustment basis [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2012: 48–52 (in Chinese).

    [24] LIU Gonghui, DONG Benjing, GAO Deli. Probability analysis of error ellipsoid (ellipse) and hole intersection [J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2000, 23 (3): 5–12 (in Chinese).

    [25] DONG Benjing, GAO Deli, LIU Gonghui. Discussion on the analytical method of well track uncertainty [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 1999, 19 (4): 59–63 (in Chinese).

This Article

ISSN:1001-0890

CN:11-1763/TE

Vol , No. 06, Pages 118-124

September 2021

Downloads:1

Share
Article Outline

Novelty

Abstract

  • 1 Composition analysis of measurement error of relative distance
  • 2 Calculation of measurement error of relative distance
  • 3 Optimal selection method for active magnetic ranging tools
  • 4 Example analysis
  • 5 Conclusions
  • References